Co-élaboration de solutions et rôle du graphico-gestuel : comparaison méthodologique : bilan de la confrontation [Co-elaborating architectural design solutions and the role of the graphico-gestural: a methodological confrontation: outcome of the methodological confrontation] (ch 5.4) - Inria - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique Access content directly
Book Sections Year : 2009

Co-élaboration de solutions et rôle du graphico-gestuel : comparaison méthodologique : bilan de la confrontation [Co-elaborating architectural design solutions and the role of the graphico-gestural: a methodological confrontation: outcome of the methodological confrontation] (ch 5.4)

Abstract

Cognitive psychologists and ergonomists have proposed various methods for the analysis of individual verbal protocols, but much less for dialogues in collective work settings. Many professional activities, however, are carried out by people working together through verbal interaction. From a perspective of cognitive ergonomics, we have developed principles for the analysis of collaborative design, amongst which the COMET method. In the framework of the MOSAIC project, researchers from cognitive ergonomics and linguistics have compared analysis methods adopted and results obtained. One of the directions has been to confront the methodological approaches adopted by linguistic interaction analysis and cognitive ergonomics to the analysis of the MOSAIC corpus through a twofold analysis of two identical segments of this corpus. The results of this confrontation concern two levels: the data-analysis method (the objects of analysis and the levels of structuring the corpus) and the interpretations adopted by each discipline (especially, the status attributed to a pre-existing theoretical framework). Interestingly, the methodological questions have been not only of a comparative nature: they have influenced also each individual analysis. The cognitive ergonomics' analysis indeed has been extended in two directions compared to previous analyses: consideration of interaction's multi-modality and introduction of a finer way to code the design solutions. The present chapter presents the conclusions of the confrontation between the two approaches.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
VT_WV_MOSAIC_Ch5_4_PrePrint.pdf (169.99 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

inria-00410722 , version 1 (24-08-2009)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : inria-00410722 , version 1

Cite

Véronique Traverso, Willemien Visser. Co-élaboration de solutions et rôle du graphico-gestuel : comparaison méthodologique : bilan de la confrontation [Co-elaborating architectural design solutions and the role of the graphico-gestural: a methodological confrontation: outcome of the methodological confrontation] (ch 5.4). F. Détienne & V. Traverso. Méthodologies d'analyse de situations coopératives de conception : Corpus MOSAIC, Presses Universitaires de Nancy, pp.169-182, 2009, 978-2-86480-950-0. ⟨inria-00410722⟩
192 View
76 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More