Incremental Realization of Safety Requirements: Non-determinism vs. Modularity - Inria - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2015

Incremental Realization of Safety Requirements: Non-determinism vs. Modularity

Ali Ebnenasir
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 999411

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of non-determinism and modularity on the complexity of incremental incorporation of safety requirements while preserving liveness (a.k.a. the problem of incremental synthesis). Previous work shows that realizing safety in non-deterministic programs under limited observability is an NP-complete problem (in the state space of the program), where limited observability imposes read restrictions on program components with respect to the local state of other components. In this paper, we present a surprising result that synthesizing safety remains an NP-complete problem even for deterministic programs! The results of this paper imply that non-determinism is not the source of the hardness of synthesizing safety in concurrent programs; instead, limited observability has a major impact on the complexity of realizing safety. We also provide a roadmap for future research on exploiting the benefits of modularization while keeping the complexity of incremental synthesis manageable.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
978-3-319-24644-4_11_Chapter.pdf (621.63 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-01446598 , version 1 (26-01-2017)

Licence

Attribution

Identifiers

Cite

Ali Ebnenasir. Incremental Realization of Safety Requirements: Non-determinism vs. Modularity. 6th Fundamentals of Software Engineering (FSEN), Apr 2015, Tehran, Iran. pp.159-175, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-24644-4_11⟩. ⟨hal-01446598⟩
35 View
83 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More