One problem common to all researchers in the field of virtual cinematography and editing is to be able to assess the quality of the output of their systems. There is a pressing requirement for appropriate evaluations of proposed models and techniques. Indeed, though papers are often accompanied with example videos, showing subjective results and occasionally providing qualitative comparisons with other methods or with human-created movies, they generally lack an extensive evaluation. The goal of this paper is to survey evaluation methodologies that have been used in the past and to review a range of other interesting methodologies as well as a number of questions related to how we could better evaluate and compare future systems.