Yes, we can! Mining Arguments in 50 Years of US Presidential Campaign Debates - Inria - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2019

Yes, we can! Mining Arguments in 50 Years of US Presidential Campaign Debates

Abstract

Political debates offer a rare opportunity for citizens to compare the candidates’ positions on the most controversial topics of the campaign. Thus they represent a natural application scenario for Argument Mining. As existing research lacks solid empirical investigation of the typology of argument components in political debates, we fill this gap by proposing an Argument Mining approach to political debates. We address this task in an empirical manner by annotating 39 political debates from the last 50 years of US presidential campaigns, creating a new corpus of 29k argument components, labeled as premises and claims. We then propose two tasks: (1) identifying the argumentative components in such debates, and (2) classifying them as premises and claims. We show that feature-rich SVM learners and Neural Network architectures outperform standard baselines in Argument Mining over such complex data. We release the new corpus USElecDeb60To16 and the accompanying software under free licenses to the research community.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
P19-1463.pdf (212.28 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Dates and versions

hal-02194887 , version 1 (21-12-2020)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02194887 , version 1

Cite

Shohreh Haddadan, Elena Cabrio, Serena Villata. Yes, we can! Mining Arguments in 50 Years of US Presidential Campaign Debates. ACL 2019 - 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jul 2019, Florence, Italy. pp.4684-4690. ⟨hal-02194887⟩
245 View
296 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More