In this paper, we propose a comparative benchmark of MO-CMAES, COMO-CMA-ES (recently introduced in [12]) and NSGA-II, using the COCO framework for performance assessment and the Bi-objective test suite bbob-biobj. For a fixed number of points p, COMO-CMA-ES approximates an optimal p-distribution of the Hypervolume Indicator. While not designed to perform on archive-based assessment, i.e. with respect to all points evaluated so far by the algorithm, COMO-CMA-ES behaves well on the COCO platform. The experiments are done in a true Black-Blox spirit by using a minimal setting relative to the information shared by the 55 problems of the bbob-biobj Testbed.