Architecture Quality Revisited - Inria - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique Access content directly
Journal Articles IEEE Software Year : 2012

Architecture Quality Revisited


There is a common belief in the software community that nonfunctional quality is fundamentally important for architecture sustainability and project success. A recent study, however, suggests that nonfunctional quality is of little relevance for users and customers, but instead mainly a concern for architects. Nontechnical constraints, such as licenses and technology providers, appear to be driving design as prominently as quality requirements. Quality requirements, such as performance, are mainly defined by architects on the basis of their experiences, and are often poorly documented and validated. This column explores whether the software community actually overestimates the relevance of nonfunctional qualities or whether the study's observations indicate a valid position on nonfunctional quality for certain types of application domains, development approaches, and organizational setups.
No file

Dates and versions

hal-00734712 , version 1 (24-09-2012)


  • HAL Id : hal-00734712 , version 1


Claudia Ayala, Xavier Franch, David Ameller, Jordi Cabot, Frank Buschmann. Architecture Quality Revisited. IEEE Software, 2012, 29 (4), pp.22-24. ⟨hal-00734712⟩
149 View
0 Download


Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More