Why are modalities good for Interface Theories? - Inria - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2009

Why are modalities good for Interface Theories?

Résumé

In this paper we revisit the fundamentals of interface theories. Methodological considerations call for supporting "aspects" and "assume/guarantee" reasoning. From these considerations, we show that, in addition to the now classical refinement and substitutability properties of interfaces, two additional operations are needed, namely: conjunction and residuation (or quotient). We draw the attention to the difficulty in handling interfaces having different alphabets - which calls for alphabet equalization. We show that alphabet equalization must be performed differently for the different operations. Then, we show that Modal Interfaces, as adapted from the original proposal by Kim Larsen, offer the needed flexibility.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
rbbcp-acsd09.pdf (188.51 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

inria-00389051 , version 1 (28-05-2009)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : inria-00389051 , version 1

Citer

Jean-Baptiste Raclet, Eric Badouel, Albert Benveniste, Benoit Caillaud, Roberto Passerone. Why are modalities good for Interface Theories?. The 9th International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design, Robert Lorenz, Jul 2009, Augsburg, Germany. ⟨inria-00389051⟩
352 Consultations
156 Téléchargements

Partager

More