https://inria.hal.science/hal-03640683Di Stefano, LucaLucaDi StefanoCONVECS - Construction of verified concurrent systems - Inria Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes - Inria - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique - LIG - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble AlpesLang, FrédéricFrédéricLangCONVECS - Construction of verified concurrent systems - Inria Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes - Inria - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique - LIG - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble AlpesCompositional Verification of Priority Systems using Sharp BisimulationHAL CCSD2022Finite state systemsEnumerative verificationCongruenceConcurrency[INFO.INFO-SE] Computer Science [cs]/Software Engineering [cs.SE]Lang, Frederic2022-04-13 17:54:002023-03-24 14:53:262022-04-14 09:28:25enReportsapplication/pdf1Sharp bisimulation is a refinement of divergence-preserving branching (a.k.a. divbranching) bisimulation, parameterized by a subset of the system's actions, called strong actions. This parameterization allows the sharp bisimulation to be tailored by the property under verification, whichever property of the modal µ-calculus is considered, while potentially reducing more than strong bisimulation. Sharp bisimulation equivalence is a congruence for parallel composition and other process algebraic operators such as hide, cut, and rename, and hence can be used in a compositional verification setting. In this paper, we prove that sharp bisimulation equivalence is also a congruence for action priority operators under some conditions on strong actions. We compare sharp bisimulation with orthogonal bisimulation, whose equivalence is also a congruence for action priority. We show that, if the internal action τ neither yield priority to nor take priority over other actions, then the quotient of a system with respect to sharp bisimulation equivalence (called sharp minimization) cannot be larger than the quotient of the same system with respect to orthogonal bisimulation equivalence. We then describe a signature-based partition refinement algorithm for sharp minimization, implemented in the BCG MIN tool of the CADP software toolbox. This algorithm can be adapted to implement orthogonal minimization. We show on a crafted example that using compositional sharp minimization may yield state space reductions that outperform compositional orthogonal minimization by several orders of magnitude. Finally, we illustrate the use of sharp minimization and priority to verify a bully leader election algorithm.