<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:hal="http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.3/" xmlns:gmlce="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.3/ce" version="1.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0 http://api.archives-ouvertes.fr/documents/aofr-sword.xsd">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>HAL TEI export of hal-01056052</title>
      </titleStmt>
      <publicationStmt>
        <distributor>CCSD</distributor>
        <availability status="restricted">
          <licence target="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/">CC0 1.0 - Universal</licence>
        </availability>
        <date when="2026-05-21T06:19:49+02:00"/>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <p part="N">HAL API Platform</p>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <body>
      <listBibl>
        <biblFull>
          <titleStmt>
            <title xml:lang="en">Comparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM Assessment Models</title>
            <author role="aut">
              <persName>
                <forename type="first">Etiel</forename>
                <surname>Petrinja</surname>
              </persName>
              <idno type="halauthorid">854209-0</idno>
              <affiliation ref="#struct-463159"/>
            </author>
            <author role="aut">
              <persName>
                <forename type="first">Alberto</forename>
                <surname>Sillitti</surname>
              </persName>
              <idno type="halauthorid">854210-0</idno>
              <affiliation ref="#struct-463159"/>
            </author>
            <author role="aut">
              <persName>
                <forename type="first">Giancarlo</forename>
                <surname>Succi</surname>
              </persName>
              <idno type="halauthorid">854203-0</idno>
              <affiliation ref="#struct-463159"/>
            </author>
            <editor role="depositor">
              <persName>
                <forename>Hal</forename>
                <surname>Ifip</surname>
              </persName>
              <email type="md5">2073ac78024b6e13f2714db96e9b1e63</email>
              <email type="domain">inria.fr</email>
            </editor>
          </titleStmt>
          <editionStmt>
            <edition n="v1" type="current">
              <date type="whenSubmitted">2014-08-14 16:19:23</date>
              <date type="whenModified">2017-12-11 10:04:12</date>
              <date type="whenReleased">2014-08-14 16:27:26</date>
              <date type="whenProduced">2010-05-30</date>
              <date type="whenEndEmbargoed">2014-08-14</date>
              <ref type="file" target="https://inria.hal.science/hal-01056052v1/document">
                <date notBefore="2014-08-14"/>
              </ref>
              <ref type="file" subtype="author" n="1" target="https://inria.hal.science/hal-01056052v1/file/OSS2010.Petrinja-Sillitti-Succi_CameraReady_20100127.pdf" id="file-1056052-860332">
                <date notBefore="2014-08-14"/>
              </ref>
              <ref type="externalLink" target="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-13244-5_18.pdf"/>
            </edition>
            <respStmt>
              <resp>contributor</resp>
              <name key="200187">
                <persName>
                  <forename>Hal</forename>
                  <surname>Ifip</surname>
                </persName>
                <email type="md5">2073ac78024b6e13f2714db96e9b1e63</email>
                <email type="domain">inria.fr</email>
              </name>
            </respStmt>
          </editionStmt>
          <publicationStmt>
            <distributor>CCSD</distributor>
            <idno type="halId">hal-01056052</idno>
            <idno type="halUri">https://inria.hal.science/hal-01056052</idno>
            <idno type="halBibtex">petrinja:hal-01056052</idno>
            <idno type="halRefHtml">&lt;i&gt;6th International IFIP WG 2.13 Conference on Open Source Systems,(OSS)&lt;/i&gt;, May 2010, Notre Dame, United States. pp.224-238, &lt;a target="_blank" href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18"&gt;&amp;#x27E8;10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18&amp;#x27E9;&lt;/a&gt;</idno>
            <idno type="halRef">6th International IFIP WG 2.13 Conference on Open Source Systems,(OSS), May 2010, Notre Dame, United States. pp.224-238, &amp;#x27E8;10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18&amp;#x27E9;</idno>
            <availability status="restricted">
              <licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC BY 4.0 - Attribution<ref corresp="#file-1056052-860332"/></licence>
            </availability>
          </publicationStmt>
          <seriesStmt>
            <idno type="stamp" n="IFIP">IFIP - International Federation for Information Processing</idno>
            <idno type="stamp" n="IFIP-AICT" corresp="IFIP">IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology</idno>
            <idno type="stamp" n="IFIP-AICT-319" corresp="IFIP-AICT">Open Source Software: New Horizons</idno>
            <idno type="stamp" n="IFIP-TC" corresp="IFIP">IFIP Technical Committees </idno>
            <idno type="stamp" n="IFIP-WG" corresp="IFIP">Working Groups</idno>
            <idno type="stamp" n="IFIP-OSS" corresp="IFIP">OSS: Open Source Software</idno>
            <idno type="stamp" n="IFIP-TC2" corresp="IFIP-TC">IFIP TC 2: Software:Theory and Practice</idno>
            <idno type="stamp" n="IFIP-WG2-13" corresp="IFIP-WG">Open Source Software</idno>
            <idno type="stamp" n="IFIP-2010">IFIP-2010</idno>
          </seriesStmt>
          <notesStmt>
            <note type="audience" n="2">International</note>
            <note type="invited" n="0">No</note>
            <note type="popular" n="0">No</note>
            <note type="peer" n="1">Yes</note>
            <note type="proceedings" n="1">Yes</note>
          </notesStmt>
          <sourceDesc>
            <biblStruct>
              <analytic>
                <title xml:lang="en">Comparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM Assessment Models</title>
                <author role="aut">
                  <persName>
                    <forename type="first">Etiel</forename>
                    <surname>Petrinja</surname>
                  </persName>
                  <idno type="halauthorid">854209-0</idno>
                  <affiliation ref="#struct-463159"/>
                </author>
                <author role="aut">
                  <persName>
                    <forename type="first">Alberto</forename>
                    <surname>Sillitti</surname>
                  </persName>
                  <idno type="halauthorid">854210-0</idno>
                  <affiliation ref="#struct-463159"/>
                </author>
                <author role="aut">
                  <persName>
                    <forename type="first">Giancarlo</forename>
                    <surname>Succi</surname>
                  </persName>
                  <idno type="halauthorid">854203-0</idno>
                  <affiliation ref="#struct-463159"/>
                </author>
              </analytic>
              <monogr>
                <title level="m">IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology</title>
                <meeting>
                  <title>6th International IFIP WG 2.13 Conference on Open Source Systems,(OSS)</title>
                  <date type="start">2010-05-30</date>
                  <date type="end">2010-06-02</date>
                  <settlement>Notre Dame</settlement>
                  <country key="US">United States</country>
                </meeting>
                <editor>Pär Ågerfalk; Cornelia Boldyreff; Jesús M. González-Barahona; Gregory R. Madey; John Noll</editor>
                <imprint>
                  <publisher>Springer</publisher>
                  <biblScope unit="serie">Open Source Software: New Horizons</biblScope>
                  <biblScope unit="volume">AICT-319</biblScope>
                  <biblScope unit="pp">224-238</biblScope>
                  <date type="datePub">2010</date>
                </imprint>
              </monogr>
              <idno type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18</idno>
            </biblStruct>
          </sourceDesc>
          <profileDesc>
            <langUsage>
              <language ident="en">English</language>
            </langUsage>
            <textClass>
              <keywords scheme="author">
                <term xml:lang="en">FLOSS Development Process</term>
                <term xml:lang="en">Software Quality</term>
                <term xml:lang="en">Quality Criteria</term>
                <term xml:lang="en">FLOSS Assessment Model</term>
              </keywords>
              <classCode scheme="halDomain" n="info.info-dl">Computer Science [cs]/Digital Libraries [cs.DL]</classCode>
              <classCode scheme="halTypology" n="COMM">Conference papers</classCode>
              <classCode scheme="halOldTypology" n="COMM">Conference papers</classCode>
              <classCode scheme="halTreeTypology" n="COMM">Conference papers</classCode>
            </textClass>
            <abstract xml:lang="en">
              <p>The objective of this study was to investigate the quality and usability of three Free/Libre Open Source Software assessment models: the Open Business Readiness Rating (OpenBRR), the Qualification and Selection of Open Source software (QSOS), and the QualiPSo OpenSource Maturity Model (OMM). The study identified the positive and negative aspects of each of them. The models were used to assess two Free/Libre Open Source Software projects: Firefox and Chrome (Chromium). The study is based on a set of controlled experiments in which the participants performed the assessment using only one model each. The model used and the Free/Libre Open Source Software project assessed were randomly assigned to the participants. The experiment was conducted in a controlled environment with defined tasks to be performed in a given time interval. The results revealed that the three models provided comparable assessments for the two assessed projects. The main conclusion was that all the three models contain some questions and proposed answers that are not clear to the assessors, therefore should be rewritten or explained better. The critical aspects of each model were: Functionality and Quality for OpenBRR; Adoption, Administration/Monitoring, Copyright owners, and Browser for QSOS ; and Quality of the Test Plan, and the Technical Environment for OMM. Participants perceived the quality and usability of the three models of comparable level.</p>
            </abstract>
          </profileDesc>
        </biblFull>
      </listBibl>
    </body>
    <back>
      <listOrg type="structures">
        <org type="institution" xml:id="struct-463159" status="VALID">
          <idno type="ROR">https://ror.org/012ajp527</idno>
          <orgName>Free University of Bozen-Bolzano</orgName>
          <date type="start">2016-09-14</date>
          <desc>
            <address>
              <addrLine>Piazza Universitá, 1, Bolzano BZ, Italia</addrLine>
              <country key="IT"/>
            </address>
          </desc>
        </org>
      </listOrg>
    </back>
  </text>
</TEI>